Obviously 19th is ridiculous, or anything outside the top 10 for that matter. But it isn’t wrong about the Bridges or KAT trades, or Jalen Brunson as a championship 1st option.
Obviously 19th is ridiculous, or anything outside the top 10 for that matter. But it isn’t wrong about the Bridges or KAT trades, or Jalen Brunson as a championship 1st option.
Any model that doesn’t spit out Boston and OKC top two in that order I’m immediately suspicious of. But this model does seem to get worse the further down you go
There is no “goal.” Analytical models have flaws but not agendas.
Jamal Murray when he doesn’t have the best player in the world screening for him:
Nah. It correctly identifies that you need an MVP-caliber best player to win with very little exception and every dropoff in quality from that guy, from top 5 to borderline top 10 to outside of it, kills your championship odds by magnitudes.