• faramaobscenaB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    A lot of people think that actually. The American was mistakenly awarded an element she didn’t perform. In fact, if the appeal hadn’t happened we’d now be talking about that controversy. Now people found something else to complain about and that took a back seat but the fact is even if the inquiry had been valid, she never should have received credit for that. Just another screw up in the collection of screw ups in this event.

    • Pinewood74B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah, we’d be talking about Voinea’s ghost deduction.

      • faramaobscenaB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s on the judges & her coach, not on Ana. If the judges hadn’t made the mistake, if her coach had made the right inquiry… but as Nadal said “if, if, if … doesn’t exist”.

        I hope all 3 of them come back stronger and win more medals to prove everybody wrong.

        • Pinewood74B
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Okay???

          It doesn’t change the fact that would be the predominant narrative. Not what precise element Chiles performed.