Arbitrators are not always randomly assigned. It’s not like a judge, because arbitration is fundamentally based on the prior agreement of the parties. In ad hoc cases they are assigned I assume cuz of the time frame. But in regular cases usually each side picks an arbitrator they hope will be favorable to their position. Then the main arbitrator picks the head one. For single arbitrators the parties try to agree on one and if that is not possible they ask for one to be assigned based on certain criteria. I don’t know which cases you’re referring to but if it’s a 3 arbitrator panel it’s entirely possible that he was Romania’s pick.
Arbitrators are not always randomly assigned. It’s not like a judge, because arbitration is fundamentally based on the prior agreement of the parties. In ad hoc cases they are assigned I assume cuz of the time frame. But in regular cases usually each side picks an arbitrator they hope will be favorable to their position. Then the main arbitrator picks the head one. For single arbitrators the parties try to agree on one and if that is not possible they ask for one to be assigned based on certain criteria. I don’t know which cases you’re referring to but if it’s a 3 arbitrator panel it’s entirely possible that he was Romania’s pick.