Yes, but nearly half of USA medals (62) came from just swimming and athletics. Those two categories are going to have a lot less weight. Taking out swimming and athletics medals for both countries, it’s 64 USA 75 China. That’s the area where China is able to get ahead. It’s not just about the team sports
So trying to look it up, seems like the USA 126 medals were earned by 257 medalists. But it’s still 126 of 1044 medals (12%). If you want to use the 257 medalists metric, it would still be 12% of all medalists.
I don’t know if anyone has specifically listed them out like how you’re describing, but it would be easy to count them yourself using this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronological_summary_of_the_2024_Summer_Olympics
The table includes the names of each athlete
I do want to say though, the current medal table is the true medal count. It is counting the number of gold silver and bronze medal events. That is the most important metric. Medal count broken down by athlete would give an indication of how many team/group events a country won, but that doesn’t mean it counts as more medal event.
Soccer had 18 athletes that won a medal, but it’s still only a single medal event
Breaking
Lol at the volunteers who’s job is to stand at the stairs and point the competitors the other way
I think it’s going to depend on whether USA entities had the chance to object. Supposedly “none of the parties involved in the hearing had objected to his appointment as the panel’s chair”. However, it’s unclear whether USAG/USOPC would be included because they were only on the case as interested parties, and the rights of interested parties are unclear (as well as exactly what parts of the trial USAG/USOPC was included in). So, it’s possible that the only people who were given an opportunity to object were the Romanian fed and FIG, because those were the actual parties the case was between (Federation Romanian Gymnastics and Ana Bărbosu v. Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique (FIG) and Donatella Sacchi)
Adding to the mess, there’s some chatter (unconfirmed, but from a reputable journalist) that CAS reached out to the wrong US officials while they were preparing for the case, but unknown how long it took to get the right ones. And going back to the interested parties thing, how much info they were given in order to prepare or how much they were able to participate in the case is unknown. The video evidence they have was denied because it came after the conclusion of the case. But did they have sufficient opportunity to uncover that evidence prior to the hearing?
Basically, there’s still a ton that’s unknown.