• rekniteB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know how French law works, but I American law to sue for defamation requires proving that the defendant knowingly said something false about you that caused damages.

    • -gourmandine-B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but as I understand it in the UK the burden is on the person who originally made the claim to prove that their claim was true.

    • ArchilochosB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mostly—for the purposes of American law, “knowingly” includes reckless indifference for whether a statement is true or not true. In this instance though the distinction is irrelevent; whether Rowling said a false statement with actual knowledge it was false or with reckless indifference to whether it was false or not, the content of medical records for which she had no access are immaterial.

    • QuickMolassesB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Europe tends to have much stricter laws around defamation. In the US, to win, you generally have to prove that they knew what they said to be untrue especially if they said it about a public figure, and truth is an absolute defense. As far as I know, that is not generally the case in Europe. I believe you can be held liable for saying things you sincerely believed were true.