While the judges did amend Jordan Chiles’ score by 0.1 point, propelling her from 5th to 3rd place, the aftermath saw the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) deem the inquiry unlawful, nullifying the score addition that occurred right after the event. This decision returned the 3rd place to Ana Bărbosu. In such a situation, I believe that the FIG and the IOC should intervene and award the bronze medal to Ana Bărbosu, Sabrina Voinea, who initially held the 4th place before Chiles, and also to Jordan Chiles—resulting in three bronze medalists. There have been precedents in other sports where the same medals were awarded due to unfair or unlawful judgment processes. What do you think?

  • Swimming-Waltz-6044B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    all three parties - CAS, FIG and IOC have already made their decisions. CAS has rendered the appeal invalid, FIG has changed the result and the IOC has asked for the medal to be returned. the three medal idea was also rejected by CAS.

    their only option now is try to fight above this.

  • SeasonOfLogicB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    My opinion is that Jordan should have graciously returned the medal immediately following the CAS decision. As an athlete myself, my question mediately goes to what is the value of the metal now that you know you didn’t earn it?

    • ismail123147OPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The dilemma is that if we base our judgment on performance, Chiles edges out Bărbosu and Voinea. The judges did indeed omit 0.1 points in the difficulty score, which they later corrected. On the other hand, if we base our judgment on a ‘by the book’ interpretation of the rules, the CAS decision is correct because the appeal came 4 seconds after the 1min deadline.

      • SeasonOfLogicB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, and I think because of the profile of this particular competition, it’s essential that it be followed by the book. Doing anything but diminishes the validity of all previous competitions as well as those in the future.

  • VisibleDoubt6B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The US is saying that they have concrete evidence that the coaches submitted not one but two appeals before the one minute deadline. The bronze medal is Chiles. The result only got overturned because Romania claimed the US didn’t submit their appeal in time, which apparently on video they actually did. The bronze medal is rightfully Chile’s’ under all of the rules.