• Researcher_1525B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’re not refusing to look at the evidence. They’re refusing to try the case again. They have so many Olympic cases to review, if they make an exception to try the same case again they have to make an exception for others too.

    • u4004B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, even in common justice with people’s freedom in the game, you’ll always have a pretty low limit to how many appeals can happen, even with egregious errors.

      • three-quarters-saneB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also, it’s not like this is a six month affair. We’re like two weeks out and it’s already happened once.

          • Researcher_1525B
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            They’ve had to rule on other Olympic related cases too. This isn’t the only case they’ve been working on this week

            Either way why would they hear an appeal on a case they already decided? People dont try the same case again in the same court, they appeal to a higher court (in this case that’s the Swiss Supreme Court).

      • ALaccountantB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        “So many”, bro. Didn’t you read it the first time? “So many”… you wouldn’t understand, but its so many.