I personally thought Jarrett Culver would be something after watching his run in 2019 Marxh Madness but i was so wrong.

  • frogfood24B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think the biggest issue with him was that he was a tweener, more so than the “mental” stuff. He looks shorter than Julius Randle who’s is 6’8 and isn’t nearly as strong. I just don’t think his game at his size translated in the NBA.

    • dillpickles007B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah he was fine as a stretch four, that was already coming en vogue in the early 2010s. He just had a horrifically low BBIQ, he had a negative AST/TO ratio for most of his career.

      • frogfood24B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Condemn him for not adapting/transitioning to a stretch 4 role, sure, but that was not his game/not what we was drafted for which is what we are relitagating.

    • ewokninja123B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      tweener or no, the “mental” stuff meant that he didn’t address it properly. Could be a small 4 or a regular sized 3. Needed to focus his game towards being a 3 and he could have been good.

      But he didn’t

    • dogtooth2222B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thank you for saying this. Beasley overpowered a bunch of college basketball players and simply couldn’t do that in the NBA. His jump shot was not reliable. Idk why people focus on “mental issues” to try and prop this guy up as some should’ve-been-world-beater. He was an elite college player, decent NBA guy