Why are Steph and even Luka in consideration for being some of the best basketball players ever when they don’t play defense? In my eyes the top 10 should be the best players on both sides of the ball, not just one. Can Steph really be considered a top 5 player all time without ever being an above average defender?

  • Driicky32OPB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Thats exactly what I’m saying, I’ve just been seeing a lot people put steph top 7-8 and wondering how he leapfrogs so many people without ever being a two way player. He for sure is one of the most influential idk about best though

    • DraymondBeanKickB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They play 5-on-5, not 1-on-1. Stephen Curry is a perfectly fine defensive point guard. Within his role in a 5-on-5 basketball team, he is in no way a liability on the defensive end (and is actually quite solid), while being one of the greatest, if not the greatest, offensive force in the league’s history.

    • wopsicle_spicB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I think those people would make the case that his offensive impact was just that extraordinary, and there’s a lot of evidence to support that.