• cs-kidB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Couldn’t he just take the $100 mill and give his people each a $1 million as a severance package? Or, if he’s cheap, give everyone at least 250K?

    I’m confused at the justification from Barkley here. He could take the extra $100 million and give enough to crew to probably retire. Or, just give enough for them to have time to find another job? I mean, these people can say I’ve worked with Charles Barkley, how difficult would it be for them to find employment elsewhere?

  • fartlapseB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    should’ve taken that 100m and given each one a million. bet they’d be happier

    • lazurisisdeadB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You aren’t wrong, but I think his heart is in the right place.

    • boringexplanationB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s a lot of crazy tax consequences and effort to give that much money to that many people. Even if the money was something he wanted to give away like that- the government doesn’t make it an easy process for Sir Charles

    • CupCakeAirB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even 500k or even 250k as a lump sum would be huge. People here tend to get caught up in the exorbitant salaries of NBA players and say things like million isn’t what it used to be due to at that moment seeing it through the eyes of a 7 to 9 figure earner with their lavish lifestyle. But, for average person their salary has not sky rocketed to keep up with inflation with a big one being housing costs. And likely never had a time they had such a huge lump sum of money available at once to invest, pay off debts, or put towards down payment towards a home.

    • OddinaryPeoplesB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      After Taxes, lawyer & accounting fees, and everything. Makes sense if you want to give those who got laid-off severance packages from the company itself. Also, it’s not like Charles will get 100m up-front. The government also will have to pursue taxes on each monetary gift for each individual.

    • Gaping_llamaB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bet they get more money that way too, even after taxes.

    • lazysheepdog716B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Three letters. IRS. Unfortunately big gifts like that get taxed to oblivion.

      • molesMOLESEVERYWHEREB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Trust fund, LLC, investment matching, Annuities. No show, no work jobs. Dollar leases. The rich have all kinds of ways to funnel money and avoid taxes.

    • Papa_HuggiesB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Remeber that story about Barkley and Jordan going out to eat and Jordan not tipping?

      Barkley took a bit away from that

    • Puzzled-Piglet-4623B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seriously. Would they want to keep their job for a year or get a check from Charles for $250k and be on vacation for a year. 50% of that crew probably make less than 100k annually

    • wange011B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I doubt Barkley is staying solely for the reason he’s saying, but doing what you’re saying seem pretty difficult logistically.

      If the $100 mil is over 10 years, then we’re looking at $10 mil per year, of which he’d receive about half due to taxes. Not sure how many people he has on the crew, but regardless, it’s likely that any money he gives to them will be then taxed again as a gift, income, or whatever. Maybe gift tax isn’t so bad here, but it seems complicated.

      Let’s say there are 20 people:

      Realistically, we’re asking him to either 1) front the $20 mil and pay it out as a lump sum or 2) give everyone $100,000 over 10 years. 2 might be nice if it was just “write 20 checks a year”, but I’m pretty sure it’d be quite annoying for tax reporting.

      We don’t even know how many people there are or how much they’re making

      • venmome10centsB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think Chuck does his own taxes. Just a guess though.

      • yapydB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        He said it at the end. Turner is also paying him to do basically nothing for a year so I’m sure that’s a factor too. But I don’t think he would’ve minded getting say 50m more to do something more intense than Inside the NBA and less than ESPN.

      • laststanceB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah people aren’t considering other things that comes along with that employment. Insurance is a big one. If someone if your family has cancer or if you have a special needs kid the cost is astronomical. Turner also probably has the “good insurance” that actually opens doors for better level of treatment, childcare, coaching, etc.

        If you’ve ever met parents with special needs kids its brutal. It’s a constant race against time trying to get the kid to each developmental milestone in time. They know once they lag behind there’s no “catching up” and the odds are stacked against them.

        This is probably a huge factor on Barkley’s mind since Ernie’s son is/was special needs.

        • hriszzzzzB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nah people aren’t considering other things that comes along with that employment. Insurance is a big one.

          you are assuming these people will be jobless if chuck leaves. They would get another jobs easily, with insurance and still have that million 2 left after taxes after chuck gifts them.

  • cmgr33n3B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kind of tired of hearing him talk so much about his contracts.

  • LIVESTRONGGB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, considering he has a 10yr/212m or so already I think he knows this was just the better move for everyone involved.

  • Nat_not_NatalieB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Couldn’t he just take the extra hundred million and pay the people himself??

  • nddnsjhshbsbsB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    “A honest days work” 😂

    ESPN would of had him working Stephen a hours 😂

  • LorjackB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not sure what he is saying here, isn’t he staying with Turner to get paid out on his current contract? that lasts a lot longer than one year. Inside the NBA will be gone after that but it would still be true if Barkley left now as well.

  • User_Many_ErrorsB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yea that was also for him to sell his soul to Liv and he did Not know that Turner wasn’t committed to getting the new contract done