How do you think prime Nash stacks up to current Luka Doncic? Who do you think was the overall better player?

  • NaLu_LuNa_FairyPieceB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Man i wish just for 1 season Nash aimed for 30+ points a game. Shit would’ve been epic

  • National_Singer_3122B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Luka.

    Nash didn’t deserve any of his MVPs.

    Just the fact that so many people are picking Luka, with no MVPs and who still has room to grow over Nash is proof enough. Imagine Luka vs Prime Shaq/LeBron/Dirk, all players Nash stole a potential MVP from just because his style of play was the next cool thing.

    Reminds me of Joker but at least he definitely deserved 2 of them.

  • GuiltyVeekB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Luka for sure. Nash gave my Kobe Lakers trouble in the 2000s but at the end, you can count on Luka to carry.

  • lordb4B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Prime Nash was *INSANELY* overrated (his MVPs were pure racism) and worse than rookie Luka.

  • KaiserKaibaB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Luka is a better player. Nash being more accomplished atm is why he ranks higher

    • lordb4B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Accomplished means “moron media voters”… Let’s not mince words…

  • ali_alB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nash was really really good.

    But the answer is Luka and it’s not particularly close.

      • lordb4B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        MVP is an award voted on by morons who know less than the average r/nba poster.

    • modestlifeB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      But the answer is Luka and it’s not particularly close.

      Explain how it’s not close when Nash won MVPs during the primes of Kobe, Timmy, Dirk, Shaq, KG, …

      • lordb4B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The MVPs were purely because Nash was white. I say this as white person.

        MVP should never be EVER used in any argument. Malone was never better than the 2nd best player in the NBA. Nash’s were a joke. AI’s were undeserving.

  • FormalDisastrous2467B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nash made for better teams and was less prone to poor shot variance. Luka can on any given night be the best in the world. If I was making a team in the modern era I’m taking Nash.