I was looking at his stats and he is a career 43.9% 3 point shooter. Last year his 3 point field goal % was 45% which was 2nd best in the league.

Although his defense isn’t that great, I don’t think it’s bad enough to pass on someone who shoots the ball so well. I believe he’s a much better defender than Trae Young. 3 point shooting is such a valuable skill in today’s NBA. So what gives?

  • DomDomRevolutionB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    New CBA has really limited the market for these types of players. Same with Tyus Jones.

    • iloveyoumiriB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve adopted the Knicks as my eastern conference team this season in hopes of this trend stopping

  • legend023B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have no clue

    I don’t see a huge difference between a guy like him and Malik Beasley yet Beasley has a contract and he doesn’t

  • WordNahMeanB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Players now are not just really good at one thing anymore. You’ve gotta have atleast 2-3 tools you’re skilled in for a roster spot now. He’ll definitely get a vet minimum somewhere though.

    Also comparing Trae Young to Luke Kennard just based on their defensive capabilities is insane lol clearly Trae Young is handling a whole lot more on the offensive end than Luke Kennard to say the least lol

  • twovles31B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Gary Trent just got the minimum recently, and there are still guys available that I would want more than Kennard like Tyus Jones and Lonnie Walker that can’t find deals so far.

  • Admirable_Strike_406B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Crazy class system the nba has. You could be a really good contributor and only make the minimum

  • BanditoDeTreatoB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because he and the Grizzlies probably have an agreement in principal to bring him back on a restructured contract, but both sides were waiting on the Grizzlies moving some dead weight salary off the books before finalizing everything, probably.

  • AleroRatkingB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    He’s not very good. He does one thing well but he can’t create it in his own and it’s easily defended.

  • CuttlefishAreAwesomeB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wonder if this will be a reason to get rid of the 2nd apron. Not sure when they’d be able to adjust the structure of the CBA or if it’s fluid.

  • BillRuddickJrPhdB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not just his defense. He’s undersized with a short wingspan and has a very low release. So it’s extremely difficult for him to get off open looks. And he can’t really playmake or create his own shot either. The league has tons of guys who can shoot close to 40% but are also long and can defend and do other things. The days of 1-dimensional catch-and-shoot guards is over. I would never sign Kennard. And I say that as someone who was a fan of his a few years ago on the Clippers.

  • ericdebenB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    He probably wants a bigger contract than what most teams are willing to offer.