Isn’t it wrong to say lebron wouldn’t fair in the eras back then because he wouldn’t have access to modern technology? Like do we realize he was drafted in 03, was an outlier athletically back then but still was in 2010’s and even now, even players drafted in 2010’s who were younger and had better technology couldn’t catch up to him, so he was basically more athletic than more modern athletes who had better access to modern technology than he did when he was younger, but when you throw him in an era with no access to those he’s suddenly unathletic? Like damn, I noticed logic only applies to other people when it’s in the favor of their argument, like how larry would be better than curry if he played today or jordan would’ve practiced three if he played today, or curry and lebron would be trash in our era, and same vice versa, it especially pisses me off when old players call newer players trash especially rasheed wallace and rodman, and they are all time greats which makes me pissed, you rarely see great new players do that, yes they say they would beat them but never I would lock up kd, he’s just tall or lebron is big, that’s it, that was rodman who got destroyed by an old bird with back braces too btw, Newer players do also say stuff like that like draymond but never simplified to that extent which is straight up disrespectful, honestly it kinda reminds me of how you’re not allowed to talk back to elders because it’s disrespectful that’s probably why I’m this affected, like is it not possible for players to adjust? Like how jordan would have adjusted to zone as well as the coaching? Like you know how al horford suddenly shot like 100x more threes as he played in today, same with lebron who now shoots more threes? Like how curry changed from a more traditional point guard to a combo guard? Great players will adjust to any era