I am new here and I haven’t seen this posted in many places, but I think medals should be counted based on the number of actual medals given out (giving more weight to team sports)

There are many discussions on how swimming/track/gymnastics skew the medal count by a lot. I think this can be solved easily by counting a gold medal in basketball as 12 gold medals (one for each member of the team). I am biased for sure, being from Serbia, but we have only 5 medals these olympics, and almost 30 olympians who came back with medals. This seems ridiculous to me.

This should also apply to team events such as relays, doubles, etc.

And before anyone says - it’s one medal per team, then every other sport (swimming/track) should have 1 (best) competitor per country, and not have the chance to win multiple medals for the same event, unless it’s a team event. This is why, due to the difference in governing bodies between sports, the medal count per medals handed out would be easiest.

I am sure this would not be accepted by countries whose medals skew heavily on individual sports, but I think it’s a fairer system than what we have right now.

  • conh3B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sure and the most prestigious new event would be the 42x1OOOm marathon. 42 gold medals up for grabs.

    I’m sure you meant well but this idea is so silly.

    Why is 30 athletes coming back with medals from 5 events ridiculous to you?

    • Tonks808B
      link
      fedilink
      Soomaaliga
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait, now I kinda wanna see a 42x1000m relay…